TrendNew Politics. Diplomacy. Markets. Tech. What matters.
Stocks 6 min read

The Fed's About to Blow Up the AI Party, and Nobody's Ready

Three weeks away from a regime shift that could crater the market. Here's what actually matters while Wall Street obsesses over earnings.

The Fed's About to Blow Up the AI Party, and Nobody's Ready

The stock market is throwing the biggest party since 2021, and everyone’s focused on whether Apple and Amazon will show up with good catering. Meanwhile, the actual bomb is sitting under the table, and it’s got a three-week fuse.

Here’s the situation: We’re in the middle of a “hyperscaler blitz” of earnings from the AI-led rally’s biggest names. Apple, Amazon, Google—they’re all coming through with results that’ll supposedly justify why their stocks have already priced in salvation through machine learning. The narrative is intoxicating. AI spending! Margin expansion! The future is now!

But there’s a material shift coming to how both the Federal Reserve and Wall Street think about the world, and it’s not three years away. It’s about three weeks away.

A young man with a tattooed arm blowing a party horn against a festive curtain backdrop. Photo by www.kaboompics.com / Pexels

When the Fed Stops Being Your Friend

The timing is absurd, almost comedic if you had the stomach for it. Right when the market’s running on fumes and beta—just pure momentum and the hope that the hyperscalers will deliver—you’ve got an “historical transition at the Federal Reserve.” That’s the euphemism for: Jerome Powell’s backing out the door, someone new is coming in, and nobody really knows if they’ll keep the party going or suddenly remember that inflation is still lurking.

I’m genuinely uncertain about how bad this actually gets. Maybe the new Fed chair is just a Powell clone with a different last name. Maybe they see the same tailwinds everyone else does. But here’s what I think: The market’s built entirely on the assumption that rates stay accommodative enough to justify today’s valuations. The second there’s any doubt about that—any hint that the new regime might tighten faster or hold longer—we’re going to see volatility that makes the last three months look like a lunch break.

The Fed’s interest rate dilemma is about to go from “manageable” to “warsh” (and yes, that’s apparently a word now). Translation: messy. Unpredictable. The kind of situation where smart money stops asking whether Apple’s earnings beat and starts asking whether they can actually exit positions without triggering a cascade.

Here’s the thing about volatility that everyone pretends to understand but doesn’t really: It’s not just a normal part of markets. It’s a part of markets when you’re repricing risk. And we’re about to do exactly that.

Detailed close-up of a newspaper displaying global financial market statistics and country flags. Photo by Markus Spiske / Pexels

The Software Guys Are Already Running Scared

While we’re all watching the hyperscalers, there’s a second-order effect happening that’s way more interesting. Software giants are getting absolutely hammered—worst stock performance in years—because the market’s terrified that AI is going to disrupt their entire business model. Makes sense, right?

But here’s the tell: Top executives are now jumping ship to OpenAI and other AI pure-plays. This isn’t some random brain drain. This is the people who know the software business best taking a hard look at which way the wind’s blowing and deciding their stock options are worth more elsewhere. You don’t bail on a legacy software company with a nice salary unless you genuinely believe your current industry is about to get its lunch eaten.

I think this is the real earnings story nobody’s talking about. Not whether Salesforce beats by two cents. But whether the entire category is structurally broken. And if your best people are already gone, or going, the answer’s probably yes.

The Berkshire Problem (and What It Means)

Berkshire Hathaway is slipping further behind the S&P 500, and that’s drawing interest from some investors. On the surface, that’s boring—value stocks underperforming growth, classic cycle, seen it a thousand times.

But there’s something darker here. Berkshire’s supposed to be the safety valve. The place where smart, cautious money goes when they’re nervous about the broad market. If Berkshire’s underperforming while the broad market’s at highs, it means even the cautious money got sucked into the rally. Nobody’s actually hedging. Nobody’s actually nervous enough to own boring, profitable, boring stocks.

That’s a warning sign the size of Wyoming. When even Buffett’s getting left in the dust, it means we’re in the “nobody wants to be the last person holding the bag, so everyone’s still in” phase. That’s not a market. That’s a hostage situation.

The Geopolitical Wildcard Nobody’s Pricing

Then there’s this completely separate thing happening: Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner are heading to Islamabad to talk Iran, and Iran’s denying any meetings are planned. You’ve got Democratic senators warning about someone potentially reopening Fed probes.

And somehow, buried in all this, tanker shipping stocks are up 600% since the start of the year—way outperforming crude oil and energy stocks—because there’s apparently some U.S.-Iran situation creating shipping chaos.

I’m being honest: I don’t know how this threads into the broader market narrative yet. But I know that when geopolitical chaos spikes in ways that benefit narrow, weird ETFs like shipping tankers, it means the real trade is something the consensus hasn’t figured out. And once consensus does figure it out, the repricing will be vicious.

The Real Setup

So we’ve got: (1) A Fed transition in three weeks that could rewrite the rules. (2) Massive earnings from companies with valuations that require perfection. (3) A software industry realizing it might be obsolete. (4) Classic defensive plays getting crushed because no one’s actually hedging. (5) Geopolitical unknowns that are already creating weird dislocations.

This isn’t a collapse thesis. I’m not sitting here saying the market goes down 30% next week. But I am saying the setup for volatility is as real as it’s been since maybe 2022, and the market’s completely unprepared for it because everyone’s still high on AI narrative.

The playbook should be: Let the hyperscaler earnings come through. Watch the Fed transition closely. And for God’s sake, have a plan for when the narrative shifts, because it will.

Detailed close-up of a newspaper displaying global financial market statistics and country flags. Photo by Markus Spiske / Pexels

What I’m Watching

  • Fed transition announcement and first policy signal (within 3 weeks): Any hint that the new regime might be less accommodative than Powell triggers a repricing. Watch Treasury yields more than equity indexes—that’s where the real tell is.

  • Software company earnings and executive departures: If we see more top talent leaving legacy software names between now and April, that’s confirmation that disruption fear is real, not just headline churn.

  • Berkshire’s relative performance through Q1: If it keeps underperforming while volatility stays low, we’re in “nobody’s hedging” territory. That’s unsustainable and it means a single bad catalyst gets ugly fast.

  • Iran-related shipping dynamics and geopolitical spillover into energy: Tanker ETF up 600% isn’t noise. Keep tabs on whether this becomes a broader energy supply story that forces tactical repositioning.